dilluns, d’agost 03, 2009
diumenge, d’agost 02, 2009
Colón era un tirano cruel
La historiadora del Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Consuelo Varela, que ha estudiado este documento inédito de 46 páginas, explicó que se trata "del texto más importante sobre la colonia aparecido en los últimos cien años".
El texto, descubierto por la archivera Isabel Aguirre, recoge 23 testimonios que fueron empleados como pruebas de un juicio, celebrado en el año 1500, que desencadenó la vuelta como presos a la Península de Colón y sus hermanos Diego y Bartolomé.
"Es un texto muy duro, de gran crudeza, que sitúa a Colón como un hombre que castiga a la gente, que hace juicios sumarios y que no distribuye los víveres entre sus propios hombres", aseguró Varela, cuya investigación aparece recogida en un libro titulado 'La Caída de Cristóbal Colón, la pesquisa de Bobadilla'.
"Caída de un mito"
Para la investigadora el texto implica -cuando se cumplen cinco siglos de la muerte del colonizador- "la caída de un mito", ya que "sabíamos que había sido retirado de su mando, pero no conocíamos las verdaderas razones".
También revela datos sobre la vida de la colonia y los españoles, "quienes pasaron verdadero hambre y veían a diario que no llegaba ningún barco con los víveres".
El documento original fue escrito por el comendador de la Orden de Calatrava, Francisco de Bobadilla, siguiendo un encargo de los Reyes Católicos, y significó la destitución de Colón como virrey y gobernador de las Indias.
"Gracias a este texto hemos conocido además que se hacían subastas con esclavos blancos y entendemos mejor varios intentos de motín en la isla [Santo Domingo]", señaló esta estudiosa de la vida y obra de Colón, que se ha servido de la transcripción de Aguirre para su estudio.
El hallazgo se produjo mientras la archivera catalogaba unos legajos que habían permanecido largo tiempo extraviados.
Algunos de los testimonios recogidos pertenecen a enemigos del navegante, pero también se incluyen declaraciones de miembros de su equipo, "que tuvieron que declarar en su contra y contar las atrocidades que ocurrieron".
Hasta ahora no se habían estudiado textos que ofreciesen una imagen negativa del almirante, que a pesar de ser destituido de su cargo, realizó un último viaje al Nuevo Mundo en 1502.
De momento, el documento original hallado permanece expuesto en la muestra "Colón desde Andalucía (1942-1505)", comisariada por la propia Varela, que acoge el Archivo de Indias, en Sevilla, hasta el próximo 15 de octubre.
dissabte, d’agost 01, 2009
Que venen els portuguesos
divendres, de juliol 31, 2009
Top Ten Things About "Rasputin" By Boney M
Top Ten Things About "Rasputin" By Boney M

y paternal grandfather, rest his soul, only liked old jazz and big band music, with one shining exception: "Rasputin". We have no idea why. - Ian Mathers.1) It’s a disco song. About Rasputin. And that’s it.
2) And now, some balalaikas
3) How you like bass?
4) Yes, it’s the double disco handclaps
5) “But to Moscow chicks he was such a lovely dear”
Most people look at him
With terror and with fear
But to Moscow chicks
He was such a lovely dear
6) It’s a little thing I like to call ‘vocal interplay’
7) “And he really came”
Then one night some men of higher standingRhyming’s a bitch, isn’t it?
Set a trap, they’re not to blame
Come and visit us, they kept demanding
And he really came
8) Once more for the ra-ra’s
9) “Hi, I’m Ed Winchester”
10) “Oh, those Russians…”
Eventually, though, it comes to an end. There is a suspicion that the songwriters might have forgotten about that until it was a bit late:
Ra ra RasputinAnd, er, that’s it.
Lover of the Russian queen
They wouldn’t quit, they wanted his head
Ra ra Rasputin
Russia’s greatest love machine
And so they shot him till he was dead
Except, of course, for the postscript, the one thing above all others that people tend to remember “Rasputin” for: “Oh, those Russians…”
dimecres, de juliol 15, 2009
Cabinet Pulls the Plug on Mexican and Czech Visa-free Travel
Cabinet Pulls the Plug on Mexican and Czech Visa-free Travel
| Published July 15, 2009 |
The decision to impose visa requirements on Mexico came down to one more vote in favour than against at the Cabinet table earlier this year, sources say. Subsequent months of intense lobbying by senior Canadian and Mexican officials trying to overturn the decision were unsuccessful.
And now that the decision is official, experts and insiders spanning refugee, trade and general foreign policy issues are lining up to take shots at what is being described as one of the most perplexing—and possibly damaging—foreign policy decisions the government has taken in some time.
The Final Blow
Since becoming immigration minister in November 2008, Jason Kenney has made no secret of his frustrations with Canada's refugee system, including the number of refugee claimants coming from Mexico.
In a speech to the Canadian Council for Refugees in Toronto in November, Mr. Kenney raised the possibility of a two-tier system where applicants from what he called "liberal democracies" like Mexico, Britain and the Czech Republic are treated differently than those from conflict zones or totalitarian societies.
When a United Nations report in March showed a 30 per cent increase in the number of people seeking asylum in Canada, Mr. Kenney told the National Post this was "clearly an abuse of Canada's generosity."
Mr. Kenney also said that a 90 per cent rejection rate of claims made by Mexicans at Canada's Immigration and Refugee Board "would suggest wide scale and almost systematic abuse."
Recent reports on the Immigration and Refugee Board have foretold of such crises and flatly stated the board desperately required more resources to respond to a growing number of refugee claims. Despite this, however, Mr. Kenney told Embassy in April there would be no additional funding.
"The chairman of the IRB tells me that it would require tripling the size of the IRB to deal with the current backlog," Mr. Kenney said. "That's clearly not an option, particularly during tight fiscal times.
As one senior diplomat who has previously been posted to Mexico told Embassy on Tuesday, the visa requirement is something that had been looming for some time, though only recently was it actively discussed.
According to sources, the split Cabinet vote that saw visa requirements adopted was held several months ago. The decision was taken quietly and never announced, and insiders believe the government might have been waiting until after the annual Security and Prosperity Partnership summit in Mexico in early August to make it public.
However, efforts were being undertaken behind the scenes to head off what was seen as a disastrous decision. Insiders say that for at least two months, top officials from the Mexican government have been treading through Ottawa, attempting to negotiate their way out of a visa requirement. As well, Foreign Affairs officials like Guillermo Rishchynski, Canada's ambassador to Mexico, were busy meeting with counterparts in the Prime Minister's Office, lobbying hard—though ultimately unsuccessfully—against the new requirement.
Then, over the past few weeks, reports began to emerge that the government was considering slapping visa restrictions on Mexico and re-imposing them on the Czech Republic. Those who knew the truth remained tight-lipped and extraordinarily cautious about who they told, and how much was said, but word slowly spread.
An article that ran in a Mexican newspaper, Excelsior, last week referred to such rumours, as did an earlier report in a newspaper in Prague. The article in Mexico had been penned by Isabel Studer Noguez, former deputy director for Canada at Mexico's ministry of foreign affairs.
Then, last week, a senior official with the Mexican Embassy in Ottawa confirmed with Embassy that visa requirements had been approved by the government but would not say any more. It was only Monday afternoon that Mr. Kenney went public with the news.
In a statement, Mr. Kenney cited soaring refugee claims from Mexico, which have tripled since 2005, as the reason for imposing visa requirements at 12:01 a.m. on July 14. In 2008, the number of claims reached 9,400, representing 25 per cent of all claims, the statement said. Only 11 per cent were accepted.
"In addition to creating significant delays and spiraling new costs in our refugee program, the sheer volume of these claims is undermining our ability to help people fleeing real persecution," Mr. Kenney said.
The Mexican Embassy in Ottawa responded with its own press release, just before 5 p.m. Monday, stating that it "regrets the decision."
"During the past few months Mexico has held consultations with Canadian authorities to assess other measures to deal with the problem of fraudulent claims," it read.
The Mexican government blamed the growing number of refugee claims from Mexico on illegitimate organizations that charge fees and mislead Mexicans acting in good faith. They also hammered at the delays causing havoc in Canada's overburdened, underfunded refugee system.
"Organizations have taken advantage of Canadian response times to assess refugee claims, where excessive delays have become appealing in the filing of illegitimate cases," they said.
The Fallout
Years ago when Canada, the U.S. and Mexico were negotiating the North American Free Trade Agreement, Demetri Papademetriou, director of the Migration Policy Institute in Washington, D.C., helped negotiate the migration sections. At that time, Canada was adamant there would be no visas.
"I recall how clear Canada was that they were not going to impose a visa for Canada and how clear the U.S. was that they were going to maintain a visa requirement," Mr. Papademetriou said. "Canada has always stuck to its guns."
But Mr. Papademetriou and others say the rising refugee claimants to Canada signalled that changes may be on the horizon. Additional factors, say experts, are the global economic recession that has wiped out jobs in the U.S. as well as remittances to Mexico, the worsening narcotics-related violence spreading across Mexico, and the Canadian government's desire to harmonize security with the U.S.
Still, while the official reaction of the Mexican government could be described as reserved—in part, sources say, because they'd resigned themselves to the visa requirements weeks, if not months, ago—there is no doubt it has punctured nerves across the country and Latin American region.
"They were extremely concerned by that, it caught them by surprise," said Mr. Papademetriou of the Mexican government's reaction when it learned of the new visa requirements. "By the time it had reached the highest political level, there was this sort of mobilization of political resources to try to see what might be possible."
But beyond the few people who had caught word of the looming visa requirement, Mr. Kenney's announcement Monday afternoon was a shock.
The Canadian Embassy in Mexico City is ill-equipped to handle visa applications and is expected to be overwhelmed for quite some time. Reports on Tuesday said the mission had temporarily closed its doors and the web site states processing of visas will take up to 45 days.
Canada's business and tourism sectors were quick to condemn the government's decision. Tourism officials warned the effects are potentially "catastrophic" and they have called on the government to delay implementation until Nov. 15, 2009.
In recent years, they say, Canada has welcomed 250,000 tourists from Mexico, 50 per cent of whom visit during July and August. Mexico is the fourth biggest overseas market for Canadian tourism, bringing in approximately $265 million annually.
Liberal Immigration critic Maurizio Bevilacqua said the Conservatives have risked erecting new hurdles to legitimate travel with a NAFTA partner, and that there could be serious economic consequences.
"We've heard concerns that there are too many false refugee claims coming from Mexico," Mr. Bevilacqua said, "But we think the need to slap a blanket visa requirement on the entire population of a country is a damning indictment of the Conservatives' broken, inefficient refugee determination system"
NDP Immigration critic Olivia Chow was equally critical and said the decision will inflict a lot of hardship on both Mexicans and Canadians.
"It's closing the door to cover up their incompetence. For two years huge numbers of vacancies were left in the Immigration and Refugee Board," Ms. Chow said. "It reminds me of Bill C-50 and how the Conservatives had the immigration backlog grow from 650,000 to 900,000, and instead of fixing the real problem they went and closed the door and froze the applications and no one could apply from March to November of last year, and now only those within 38 categories can apply."
Others, meanwhile, say this will have a negative effect on Canada's foreign policy priority of engagement with Latin America, particularly because it will appear that Canada and the U.S. are one and the same in their policies.
"I don't know why Kenney would win on this issue," a source familiar with the political wrangling that happened at the Cabinet table and behind the scenes told Embassy on condition of anonymity. "It's a loser for the government's Americas policy, a loser on the trade front, and it will harm the Canadian tourism industry. What's the win? Why did they push for this?"
Annette Hester, a senior fellow with the Centre for International Governance Innovation, said the decision to impose visas is "incredibly unfortunate."
"It adds to the list of aggravants and I think it doesn't help develop credence for Canada's Americas policies," Ms. Hester said. "It is hard to judge, but you could speculate or you could imagine that countries in the Americas observe that Canada's reaction to strife and difficulty...might be perceived as one of 'I'll protect myself' and not one of 'I understand you're having a very difficult time, what can we do to help you?'"
Carol Wise, an associate professor at the University of Southern California's School of International Relations, said that Canada's visa requirement is a harsh blow against Mexico, and signals a deterioration of relations for the continent.
"I think it's probably going to be more bitterness given that we've constructed a $7-billion wall at the border and Canadians were always seen as the partner that had better understanding and a more humane attitude toward Mexico," Ms. Wise said. "We are really, really flirting with the collapse of any sense of a North American community."
Meanwhile, Janet Dench, executive director of the Canadian Council for Refugees, said she was very upset to hear of the visas and said Canada's refugee system wrongly characterizes Mexico as being able to protect its citizens when it often cannot.
"[Refugee claims] are one of the few options that people have for being able to get out of the situation where they're being abused and Mexico has been a country where there was a possibility at least for people who had sufficient money to buy an airfare, and that's much cheaper than having to pay for a smuggler," Ms. Dench said. "Unfortunately the policies of a government like Canada will force refugees into the hands of smugglers by putting on the visa requirement."
mcollins@embassymag.ca
dissabte, de juliol 11, 2009
We must not forget Srebrenica
We must not forget Srebrenica
On the anniversary of the Srebrenica massacre, we must commit to tackle racial and religious hate crimes fuelled by the far right
- Muhammad Abdul Bari
- guardian.co.uk, Saturday 11 July 2009 13.00 BST
- Article history
In early July 1995, during several days of carnage, Bosnian Serb forces commanded by Ratko Mladić summarily executed more than 8,000 Muslim men and boys who had sought sanctuary in the town of Srebrenica. Nearly 25,000 women, children and elderly people were forcibly deported, and rapes and beatings were common, making this event the biggest war crime to take place in Europe since the end of the second world war.
In January this year the European parliament voted to designate 11 July as Srebrenica remembrance day to ensure that the memory of this terrible crime lives on. It is a warning and a reminder that more than 60 years after the Holocaust caused an entire generation to say "never again", the dangers of sectarianism and division are as real as ever.
and police warnings of a threat of terrorism from the far right highlight the need to take on this extremism, no matter where it finds root.
That urgency is underlined by the shocking murder of Marwa al-Sherbini, a Muslim woman who was killed at a Dresden courtroom by someone who hated her decision to adopt the headscarf. The muted response to her murder is equally shocking, with officials describing the tragedy as an "incident", and German media focusing on courtroom security rather than asking what motivated the assailant's deep hatred for Muslims.
Surely this is a wake-up call for all of us to reflect and resolve to be ever vigilant. The muted response from our politicians and media is astounding. In fact, many are anxious that we are creating the atmosphere for such attacks to take place. As Nicolas Sarkozy's recent remarks on women who choose to wear the burka show, too many of our leaders seek to accommodate the far right instead of tackling them head-on. We must mark the 14th anniversary of the Srebrenica massacre with a renewed vigour to take on divisive ideologies and the peddlers of racial and religious hatred.
dissabte, de juliol 04, 2009
Les 'Lolitas' de Teheran
Les 'Lolitas' de Teheran
Melcior Comes / Escriptor
AMB LA LLEI A LA MÀ, UNA DONA a l'Iran val la meitat d'un home, pot ser assassinada impunement si és sorpresa en adulteri, i serà lapidada si el marit pot contenir-se i la posa en mans de la justícia. El divorci només depèn de la voluntat de l'home; i la dona tan sols podrà tenir la custòdia dels fills mentre aquests tinguin menys de set anys. Poden ser condemnades a morir amb tan sols nou anys, un cop s'ha rebaixat fins a aquest punt l'edat per casar-se. Tampoc les dones no poden anar soles a declarar en un judici. Ara mateix, hi ha condemnades a mort diverses lesbianes, esperant l'execució. Així, l'any passat, Pegah Emambakhx, una lesbiana iraniana a l'exili, temia ser expulsada d'Anglaterra i repatriada al seu país, on possiblement seria condemnada a morir de la pitjor manera. Tan sols els italians s'oferiren a acollir-la.
L'ANY 2006 UN ASSAGISTA TAN brillant com Ramin Jahanbegloo -autor de dos llibres de converses excepcionals, amb George Steiner i Isaiah Berlin, i amb obra traduïda al català- va ser detingut a l'aeroport de Teheran, en tornar de l'Índia, acusat d'espionatge pel règim sàtrapa d'Ahmadinejad. Va estar quatre mesos empresonat, tot per ser un dels opositors més notoris i escoltats d'aquella teocràcia. Un bon plegat dels millors escriptors del panorama mundial demanaven la seva posada en llibertat, entre els quals hi havia J.M. Coetzee i Umberto Eco.
A L'IRAN LES COSES ESTAN D'AQUESTA manera, encara que nosaltres preferim parlar dels mocadors que les seves dones porten al cap. ¿Per què no surten ara a les places públiques a manifestar-se contra aquest règim tots els que sortiren a bramar contra el suposat "genocidi" palestí? ¿Per què no demanar ara un trencament de les relacions diplomàtiques, o un boicot ridícul dels seus productes comercials, per exemple de pistatxos, ja que l'Iran n'és el principal productor mundial? ¿Per què una feminista tan notòria com Rosa Maria Sardà, que va treure el cap per passejar per Barcelona la pancarta que afirmava que Israel era com l'Alemanya nazi, no surt a defensar un lema semblant, ara amb més encert? A l'Estat d'Israel hi ha un règim de llibertats, igualtat de sexes, democràcia neta, laïcitat i separació de poders: res d'això no tenen a l'Iran. ¿On són ara els magribins que sortiren pels carrers de Palma o Barcelona? ¿Per què no sortim tots a demanar la democràcia i el fi de la violència a Teheran?
LA MANERA COM MOLTS marroquins tracten les seves dones als nostres pobles i ciutats -gairebé no surten de casa, sempre guaitant des de tots els balcons penombrosos, moltes no poden anar a comprar soles- els deu apropar sentimentalment al règim dels aiatol·làs, però, ¿i les nostres dones progressistes? ¿Per què no surten ara a reivindicar la caiguda d'un règim infame? ¿Que potser el progressisme d'esquerres simpatitza amb Ahmadinejad?
NO VOLDRIA SUPOSAR-HO, ENCARA que aquest és ben amic de Chaves, que cau molt bé als membres més tronats de la nostra esquerra eixelebrada. I els és simpàtic sense que hi hagi tampoc una bona explicació. Alguns dels actuals amics de Chaves es van distingir per la seva oposició a Franco, és cert, però Chaves fa el mateix que el nostre vell dictador, per exemple en restricció de llibertats i en matèria econòmica. Franco ho va nacionalitzar tot, des de la siderúrgia fins al tabac, els trens, el telèfon, les drassanes, la televisió, les mines i els avions, i Chaves fa el mateix, arruïnant un país, sense que s'alcin contra seu les veus dels nostres tan bonhomiosos llibertaris.
LES 50.000 BONES PERSONES QUE sortiren pels carrers de Barcelona contra Israel el passat mes de gener haurien de llegir l'obra de la professora Azar Nafisi: Llegir "Lolita" a Teheran. Nafisi va ser expulsada de la universitat iraniana per no portar el mocador, i va decidir muntar unes classes a casa seva, on ella i les seves alumnes llegien i comentaven grans obres de la literatura universal, totes prohibides a l'Iran: des de Jane Austen a Henry James, passant per Scott Fitzgerald, tot i que va ser Nabokov qui els va arribar a l'ànima. Les iranianes veien en Humbert Humbert, el poeta pèrfid i pedòfil de Nabokov, una representació perfecta dels homes del seu país, ja que ells, com el protagonista de la novel·la, les tenen reduïdes, tancades, sempre engelosits i furiosos, encara que sense les delicadeses ni vel·leïtats elegíaques d'aquell gran immoralista. Pobres dones de l'Iran. I pobres tots nosaltres, perduts i callats enmig de tants contrasentits.
HAURÍEM, TOTS PLEGATS, DE plantejar-nos quin paper volem jugar en aquesta injustícia. En depèn la nostra credibilitat. No podem seguir fent el ridícul d'aquesta manera, tolerant algunes infàmies enmig d'un silenci culpable o implícitament còmplice i protestant davant les injustícies quan ens vingui de gust, tot perquè hi ha alguns morts que ens cauen més simpàtics o que no han caigut sota les bombes d'alguns enemics atàvics, siguin els EUA o l'Estat d'Israel (l'imperialisme sionista).
PER SORT, PERÒ, ELS IRANIANS NO necessiten el nostre suport per fer camí cap a la llibertat i la democràcia. Tant Nafisi com Jahanbegloo treballen des dels EUA. Durant els anys setanta, l'aiatol·là Khomeini va trobar a França moltes simpaties mentre s'estava a l'exili a causa del seu radicalisme. Michel Foucault -encara un dels cappares del nostre pensament progressista, almenys a les universitats- va escriure llargs articles defensant la revolució teocràtica de Khomeini, veient en ell "una nova forma de creativitat", tot perquè Khomeini unia una ideologia tradicional (l'islam) al discurs antiimperialista de l'esquerra.
LA "REVOLUCIÓ ESPIRITUAL" QUE tant aplaudia Foucault, aquesta "dimensió espiritual en la política" que inaugurava Khomeini, es traduïa amb nenes vestides de negre fins als peus, dones apunyalades perquè passejaven sense vel i dilapidacions per homosexualitat o infidelitat conjugal. Khomeini vigilava i castigava, talment ho fa ara Ahmadinejad sense recordar-se de Foucault.
L'ESTAT PALESTÍ PATROCINAT per Hamàs -que implantaria un règim islamista com el d'Ahmadinejad, o més cruel- tindrà moltes coses a agrair als actors i cantants i joves i vells amb kúfia que sortiren a cremar banderes i a bramar pels carrers de Barcelona, mentre que ni una sola gota d'alliberament i emancipació civil i sexual sortirà d'aquí cap a l'Iran. Només per això ja ens hauria de caure la cara de vergonya.